Scores and Comments
22.c.pr.101.495
NWD Projects, Inc.
Application Details |
|
|---|---|
| Proposal Type | Specific Cultural Project - Discipline-Based |
| Request Amount |
$20,000
|
| Total Score | 541.000 |
| Average Score | 90.167 |
Panelist Scores
| Panelist | Excellence | Impact | Management | Accessibility | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Issaev Ruby | 37 | 29 | 17 | 9 | 92 |
| Knowles Katherine | 37 | 25 | 17 | 9 | 88 |
| Lowe Shawn | 37 | 26 | 19 | 9 | 91 |
| Rosko Melissa | 37 | 27 | 17 | 10 | 91 |
| Thornton Jermaine | 37 | 28 | 16 | 8 | 89 |
| Williams Trent D. | 37 | 27 | 17 | 9 | 90 |
Comments |
|
|---|---|
| Issaev Ruby - Score: 92.000 | |
| {No comments provided.} | |
| Knowles Katherine - Score: 88.000 | |
| {No comments provided.} | |
| Lowe Shawn - Score: 91.000 | |
|
|
| Rosko Melissa - Score: 91.000 | |
|
EXCELLENCE: Detailed, thorough program description; Excellent integration of digital mediums; Thorough detail on goals, but would like to see quantitative benchmarks throughout objectives (i.e., how will the completion and success of these objectives be determined?); Strong list of statewide partnerships. IMPACT: Excellent reach, nationwide participation; Great detail in addressing statewide demographics served, would like to see a source/citation for this data; Would like to see quantitative detail on economic impact of the organization (Americans for the Arts Economic Prosperity Tool); Measurable, varied marketing plan. MANAGEMENT: Proven fundraising track record; Excellent fiscal condition narrative, would only add award amounts for the grants listed; Thorough, detailed evaluation infrastructure--great survey response rate; Would like more detail on budget increases on the expense side. ACCESSIBILITY: Varied accommodations for protected populations; Thorough, thoughtful programs for inclusion of diverse socioeconomic communities. Would like to see more information on the program which serves students with learning disabilities. Wonderful to see a collaboration with Karen Peterson Dancers.
|
|
| Thornton Jermaine - Score: 89.000 | |
| Strong detail, very clear and grounded. Great idea including virtual possibilities for engagement | |
| Williams Trent D. - Score: 90.000 | |
| Positive financial track record, and detailed management plan. | |