Scores and Comments
24.c.ps.170.470
Golisano Children's Museum of Naples
Application Details |
|
|---|---|
| Proposal Type | General Program Support - Discipline-Based |
| Request Amount |
$150,000
|
| Total Score | 625.000 |
| Average Score | 89.286 |
Panelist Scores
| Panelist | Quality of Offerings | Impact | Track Record | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davis Matthew | 27 | 27 | 27 | 81 |
| Duhaney Carla | 33 | 32 | 29 | 94 |
| Falwell Kerry | 33 | 30 | 27 | 90 |
| Joseph Samuel | 28 | 32 | 24 | 84 |
| Murray Kimberly | 33 | 27 | 23 | 83 |
| Raposo Sara | 33 | 33 | 28 | 94 |
| Stone Aislinn | 35 | 34 | 30 | 99 |
Comments |
|
|---|---|
| Davis Matthew - Score: 81.000 | |
| A solid overall form, though more on your evaluative processes across all aspects of the museum and its operations would be appreciated. | |
| Duhaney Carla - Score: 94.000 | |
| I am impressed with your diverse programming, especially the Exceptional Nights for children with physical, neurological or sensory disorders. Also the Discovery Nights inviting partner agencies to escort homeless, sheltered or at risk children to your facility. | |
| Falwell Kerry - Score: 90.000 | |
| {No comments provided.} | |
| Joseph Samuel - Score: 84.000 | |
|
budget: deficit every year The applicant should consider including more "letters of support" from community partners and stakeholders in future proposals.
|
|
| Murray Kimberly - Score: 83.000 | |
|
Section E14: Impact on children not clearly defined. Outreach is limited. Operating deficit indicated in all three years (Section G5).
|
|
| Raposo Sara - Score: 94.000 | |
| Varied and inclusive educational programming. Great connections and exposure to national and international arts and culture. Extensive and clearly describes partnerships/collaborations. Mission statement clearly describes organization and programs/activities fully support the mission. incorporates STEAM with a series of programs connecting with formal schools, libraries, family engagement, integrating children with special needs. | |
| Stone Aislinn - Score: 99.000 | |
|
Goals are clearly stated, objectives are measurable. Activities are described in detail and support the goals. Partnerships are extensive and the organization improves its community through collaborations with numerous social services and human welfare organizations. Benefits of partnerships are clearly described. Impact: Could have used a bit more information on demographics. Family status, income, etc. of service area. Free admission opportunities are numerous, demonstrating a commitment to accessibility for underserved/disadvantaged community groups. More information on board diversity. Organization states that within the County's public school system the majority of students are minorities, with over half identifying as Hispanic/Latino. Do the demographics of the board reflect this? Are there voices at the table representing the significant minority population and cultural diversity of the County? Track record: Financial stability is demonstrated, and evaluation plan and methods are clearly described. Measurable outcomes are listed.
|
|