Scores and Comments

25.c.pr.800.621

Ron Garrett

Application Details

Proposal TypeSpecific Cultural Project - Individual Artist
Request Amount
$25,000
Total Score437.000
Average Score87.400

Panelist Scores

Panelist Quality of Offerings Impact Track Record History and Heritage Total
Fisher Naomi 28 30 26 0 84
Jean Edson 33 30 30 0 93
Kalin Betsy 28 28 28 0 84
Kehoe Katie 33 33 30 0 96
Ponce Libbi 23 30 27 0 80

Comments

Fisher Naomi - Score: 84.000

Quality of Offerings: 28

-Solid printmaker of images that are easy to understand and show natural parks.

-the artwork is a bit simple and cartoon like 

Impact: 30

  • I like imagining this artist on a trail talking to nature goers. This kind of role is important for bringing art and nature together 
  • Parents are vague, but I’m not marking down too much for this as they have been doing this for a while 

Track Record: 26

  • They received a grant for this last fiscal year and are continuing the project
Jean Edson - Score: 93.000
{No comments provided.}
Kalin Betsy - Score: 84.000
{No comments provided.}
Kehoe Katie - Score: 96.000

He describes his project as being completed withing 6 years, which is longer than permitted by the grant… I understand this is part of a larger project, it could be clearer what he hopes to complete with these funds within the permitted time period. Scope of work to be covered by grants is covered in objectives section – at least 8 prints. Good detail listed in project activities. 

Also, has he spoke with the Capitol about donating the works, a letter of interest would be helpful.

In partnerships it’s helpful he lists institutional interest in presenting the body of work he is building through this project. Also the nature of the institutions he’s listed is diverse, which suggests, in addition to public facing aspects of the projects working site specifically, help to appeal to a broad and diverse audience.

It could strengthen this app if the parks he intends to visit had been selected and there were letters of support from the parks, with the possibility for public engagement initiatives acknowledged. However, the fact that this is part of a continuing project, which is well documented to demonstrate the artist’s ambitions are achievable and they are well positions to be successful.

Budget looks detailed with significant in kind and cash matches to demonstrate investment by partners.

Substantial CV and documentation of work to demonstrate this artists experience and capacity

Ponce Libbi - Score: 80.000
Quality of artworks could benefit from critique session to identify areas of improvement.