Quality of Offerings: 26

-Only quotes from viewers and a playbill and photo with audience, hard to evaluate quality 

-Artist is a disabled veteran from Vietnam Era

Impact: 32

-many people have attended previous iterations. Seems like they have a good following among retiree’s and VA folks, a target audience that is wonderful to address.

-Very conscious of ADA, special needs, and Veterans 

-Live streaming via YouTube 

-Stated confirmation with a theater with solid track record and PR team, but no letter of support from them.

-payments to actors, artists, musicians, etc involved with the play

Track Record: 25

-Brochure of Play in St. Augustine 

-Many quotes recommending him from writers and professors

-4 published books of poetry since retirement

Description of objectives and project activities could be strengthened with greater clarification.

It’s good that he has listed partners who have expressed interest in being involved.

Response to Evaluation could be clarified to more specifically address how he will evaluate the success of the project.   

Re: impact, helpful that you mentioned the collaboration with 7Story Rabbit and Iron Pixel Media for live streaming and actions you will take to ensure the archived materials is accessibility to people with different abilities.

In response to Impact: Access, question 3, it would strengthen your app to address each point you selected and say specifically how it would be achieved.

Budget looks detailed with significant in kind and cash matches to demonstrate investment by partners.

Support materials are weak, it would significantly strengthen your application to submit a sample of the writing and a video excerpt that shows one of the readings.