Scores and Comments

25.c.pr.800.258

Application Details
Proposal Type	Specific Cultural Project - Individual Artist
Request Amount	$12,800
Total Score	418.000
Average Score	83.600

Panelist	Quality of Offerings	Impact	Track Record	Total
Fisher Naomi	27	25	24	76
Jean Edson	30	30	30	90
Kalin Betsy	30	28	24	82
Kehoe Katie	28	28	30	86
Ponce Libbi	26	28	30	84

Comments
Fisher Naomi - Score: 76.000
Quality of Offerings: 27 -Interesting concept -Art is fair to good, but compared to some of the other emerging artists, could use some more growth. If they don’t get it, they should absolutely apply in the future. Impact: 25 -Normal outreach strategy, good anticipated numbers -No clear PR strategy -No letter of commitment or support Track Record: 24 -Recent MFA 2023 from UF -Management section highlighted films traveling nationally and internationally to film festivals, talks at universities, and one exhibition. -CV: shows they are an emerging artist gaining traction Reasonable ask - not asking for the max.
Jean Edson - Score: 90.000
{No comments provided.}
Kalin Betsy - Score: 82.000
{No comments provided.}
Kehoe Katie - Score: 86.000
The project description, goals, objectives and activities are clearly communicated and it’s helpful they have already identified and reached out to a number of potential partners. Impacts listed are thoughtful and well organized. This area could be strengthened if more partnerships were confirmed, which would help to communicate more definitively the impact this project would have. It would be helpful if descriptive information was provided with the work samples, and including additional work samples, could strengthen this app.
Ponce Libbi - Score: 84.000
An accepted proposal and/ or a letter of support from a presenting venue would improve the application.