Quality of Offerings: 30

-CV is more of a professional resume, not an artist resume

-Only one support material - a video

-I wish there was more support material to show this artist’s work, it sounds great and the one video was good. But a clear history of this person as an artist was not evident.

-Googling led me to consulting, but not art making

Impact: 32 (Update to 33)

-Honorariums to 10 artists who will be collaborators (all listed by name)

-Partnering with many libraries and arts orgs in Miami Dade

-Lists GMVB and other big orgs she has worked with in the past

-No letters of support, but has collaborated with these institutions in the past

-Not asking for full amount, has clear idea of cost needs

(Arscht, Af Am cultural artis center, and more on track.)

Track Record: 24 (Update to 27)

-Has a fiscal Sponsor

-Has experience partnering with educational institutions and prominent arts orgs

-20 year history in Miami & Atlanta

-Artist in Residence for Community Justice Project

-Hard to find clear history of this person as an individual artist beyond the consulting CV

(UPDATES: Further in talks with local orgs and alumni school. Not an emerging artist - rather in Arts for Learning - educator in the arts space. First activation for public debut as an artist in this new form.)

Project Description could be strengthened if collaborating artists and their roles were described. Project activities is detailed and gives insight into the nature and scope of project as well as confirmed partners; confirmed and anticipated partnerships are named.

Support materials could be strengthened by including more work samples as well as a letters of support from confirmed partners.

Budget is vague, there are many collaborators the applicant identified and it could be clearer how funds will be distributed.