Scores and Comments
25.c.pr.110.064
City of St Petersburg Department of Arts, Culture & Tourism
Application Details |
|
|---|---|
| Proposal Type | Specific Cultural Project - Discipline-Based |
| Request Amount |
$25,000
|
| Total Score | 538.000 |
| Average Score | 89.667 |
Panelist Scores
| Panelist | Quality of Offerings | Impact | Track Record | History and Heritage | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| McCarty Alison | 29 | 31 | 27 | 0 | 87 |
| Monroe Pamela | 33 | 27 | 27 | 0 | 87 |
| Parrish Stone Christina | 31 | 31 | 30 | 0 | 92 |
| Rusnak Jeff | 32 | 28 | 27 | 0 | 87 |
| Tanna Mira | 30 | 33 | 27 | 0 | 90 |
| West-White Clarissa | 35 | 30 | 30 | 0 | 95 |
Comments |
|
|---|---|
| McCarty Alison - Score: 87.000 | |
| I love the extensive list of programming and activities and the support materials that showcase them. I would like to have seen more objectives relating to improvements or increases rather than minimums. | |
| Monroe Pamela - Score: 87.000 | |
|
|
| Parrish Stone Christina - Score: 92.000 | |
|
good partnersnips innovative programming
good support materials |
|
| Rusnak Jeff - Score: 87.000 | |
|
Grant proposal lacking details and a sense of story about the purpose for this project. Proposal impact didn't address how individuals, such as writers, students and partnering entities, including the local bookstore, are impacted. The "Build Your Audience" section is generic and lacking detail. A missed opportunity to discuss how the project can offer a collaborative space for writers and the literary arts in the City during and beyond the event. Virtual programming is good. The attached documents were helpful, though some of that material could have been included in the narrative to make the proposal stronger.
|
|
| Tanna Mira - Score: 90.000 | |
|
|
| West-White Clarissa - Score: 95.000 | |
| Although the quality of offerings and track record were clearly established, I had concerns about the number of anticipated youth reached by the project. | |