Scores and Comments

25.c.ps.110.330

Application Details
Proposal Type	General Program Support - Discipline-Based
Request Amount	$69,123
Total Score	543.000
Average Score	90.500

Panelist	Quality of Offerings	Impact	Track Record	Total
McCarty Alison	33	31	28	92
Monroe Pamela	32	27	27	86
Parrish Stone Christina	28	28	24	80
Rusnak Jeff	33	33	29	95
Tanna Mira	31	34	30	95
West-White Clarissa	35	30	30	95

Comments
McCarty Alison - Score: 92.000
I like that the objectives clearly support the listed goals, in a specific and measurable way. The activities and partnerships are well described. The support materials are well put together.
Monroe Pamela - Score: 86.000
goals and objectives seem clear program timeline gives helpful information
Parrish Stone Christina - Score: 80.000
Goals are VERY broad 800 total participants and that includes parents no real data that helps with evaluating quality of programming or results support materials insufficient
Rusnak Jeff - Score: 95.000
The mission statement is clear and compelling. Very well-written grant for an entity that fills a unique niche for young people.
Tanna Mira - Score: 95.000
Strong application! I would love to hear which professional writers, publishers and editors meet with your students. Support letters could add a few more points to an already solid application.
West-White Clarissa - Score: 95.000
Funding request support salaries. How will they fund these positions in the future? Increased sponsorships? Funding?