Scores and Comments
19.c.pr.200.247
Town of Greenville
Application Details |
|
---|---|
Proposal Type | Specific Cultural Project - Arts In Education |
Request Amount |
$25,000
|
Total Score | 452.000 |
Average Score | 90.400 |
Panelist Scores
Panelist | Excellence | Impact | Management | Accessibility | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cox Elaine | 36 | 25 | 19 | 10 | 90 |
Jose Brian | 36 | 27 | 18 | 8 | 89 |
Palkhivala Tania | 37 | 29 | 18 | 10 | 94 |
Rivera Darren | 36 | 30 | 19 | 9 | 94 |
Rusconi Ellen | 34 | 27 | 15 | 9 | 85 |
Comments |
|
---|---|
Cox Elaine - Score: 90.000 | |
Love to see in your proposal that you present in English and Spanish to provide equal accessibility to all students. | |
Jose Brian - Score: 89.000 | |
Applicant provides suitable evidence of programs , goals and objectives supporting mission. Further, applicant provides excellent list of partners. Applicant provides strong evidence of educational impact, but no mention of economic impact. Reviewer would like more detail in Accessibility section from applicant.
|
|
Palkhivala Tania - Score: 94.000 | |
The application instructions request fully measurable objectives in the Proposal Description section. I do not see any language about the metrics used to measure success of this Specific Cultural Project. Thank you for speaking to how language is an acccessibility issue that you address in your work. Given you indicate a $10,000 In-Kind Match under Performance Fees in the budget, it would be useful to know "the wage rate the individual is normally paid for the service" so that reviewers have an understanding of how much time is being attributed to this match. |
|
Rivera Darren - Score: 94.000 | |
Strong impact via bilingual (or Spanish-language only) performances, and commitment to connecting with young artists in the communities they visit. Overall, a very strong application. | |
Rusconi Ellen - Score: 85.000 | |
clearly stated activities and partnerships high impact numbers very clear proposal. Good videos available |