Scores and Comments

19.c.ps.101.123

Peter London Global Dance Company, Inc.

Application Details
Proposal Type	General Program Support - Discipline-Based
Request Amount	$25,000
Total Score	446.000
Average Score	89.200

Panelist Scores

Panelist	Excellence	Impact	Management	Accessibility	Total
Andree Dale	38	30	18	8	94
Davis Tenaj	40	28	20	10	98
Jenkins David	34	25	12	9	80
Klein Kathleen	36	26	20	10	92
Schnell Adam	33	25	16	8	82

Comments
Andree Dale - Score: 94.000
Mission of this company is an important asset to the community and to the support and growth of Miami dancers. Suggestions for strengthening the organization and the grant - Listing of events is vague and timeline doesn't match the proposed number of performances in narrative. question of amount in budget for contracted services and admissions in relation to performances projected. Sample of Marketing Plan is not a Marketing Plan. More elaboration on Accessibility is necessary. Videos too highly edited to really show quality of choreography
Davis Tenaj - Score: 98.000
Excellence: Is it that all of the of opportunities for public participation are not included in the proposal? How can the estimated number of opportunities for public participation exceed the number of proposal events? Impact: Aside from listed opportunities for exposure, educational components are not clearly articulated.
Jenkins David - Score: 80.000
I advise you to have someone thoroughly proof your narratives for errors. It greatly diminishes an organization's credibility, despite any artistic merit of the program, to have an application full of typographical and grammatical errors. Your objectives do not seem very measurable. You continue to grow by ____? Similarly it would have helped me to see specific numbers, reaches, etc in your marketing and promotion plans. The rate of growth in Private Support: Other seems pretty high, is there a reason for that? The State support funding numbers also seem rather optimistic. I would have liked other information on accessibility other than a contact and an assertion of ADA-compliancy. Good support materials, neatly laid out.
Klein Kathleen - Score: 92.000
WELL ORGANIZED SUBSTANTIAL SUPPORT
Schnell Adam - Score: 82.000
This proposal was very light on concrete details of what panelists are agreeing to fund. While I understand your organization is transitioning from project based work towards a full season, the way the proposal is put together leaves many things unclear.