Scores and Comments
19.c.ps.101.066
Dance Alive!, Inc.
Application Details |
|
|---|---|
| Proposal Type | General Program Support - Discipline-Based |
| Request Amount |
$78,520
|
| Total Score | 480.000 |
| Average Score | 96.000 |
Panelist Scores
| Panelist | Excellence | Impact | Management | Accessibility | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andree Dale | 40 | 30 | 20 | 10 | 100 |
| Davis Tenaj | 37 | 28 | 20 | 10 | 95 |
| Jenkins David | 36 | 28 | 20 | 10 | 94 |
| Klein Kathleen | 38 | 28 | 20 | 10 | 96 |
| Schnell Adam | 38 | 28 | 19 | 10 | 95 |
Comments |
|
|---|---|
| Andree Dale - Score: 100.000 | |
| Thank you for the extended video selections! Beautiful work. Excellent materials, extensive community partners, fully thought out and realized accessibility compliance, excellent management | |
| Davis Tenaj - Score: 95.000 | |
|
Objectives are very generic. Goals are too broad. For example, 6 to 10 is a difficult range to measure success. Please try to be more specific in the future.
Impact: How frequently have you worked with an advisory group of teachers to develop programming and curriculum? |
|
| Jenkins David - Score: 94.000 | |
|
Mainstage attendance of 40,000 seems ambitious. Good luck! Can you provide more specific #'s for the way you impact the economy? Good accessibility narrative. Is 46 now old? Uh oh ... :) Clear and well-organized support materials. |
|
| Klein Kathleen - Score: 96.000 | |
|
Where in PbC does Dance Alive perform- Century Village? Great support Wonderful company |
|
| Schnell Adam - Score: 95.000 | |
|
This is an exemplary proposal in terms clarity and structure. It was well written and very readable. In addition, it clearly demonstrates what DANB is all about. |
|