Your activity plan is awe-inspiring -- brimming with great ideas, truly multidisciplinary, and creatively nurturing artists and audiences.  The measurable objectives make your Festival sound more limited-to-visual-arts than it is.  Could you add metrics for the music, literary, and theatrical elements?

Marketing:  volunteer recruitment practices sound promising.  Do they work?

I like the mental picture your descriptions give of the Big Blue Bus, but couldn't find literal pictures of it on your website.

There are typos in the Fiscal Condition and Sustainability sections -- word glitches that came as a surprise, given the elegance of the preceding sections.

Budget shows surprising swings in lines 1 and 11.  Why?

Accessibility statement is very pro-active; why is date of 504 self-evaluation 2015, if this self-evaluation is annual?

The "Walking with the Expert" program strikes me as a stroke of genius.  What a great idea!  "Living Windows" is proof that genius can strike twice in the same festival.  Add in the Native American Flute Festival, your other music programs, the Literary Arts Festival, and the Artist Demonstration Stage, and you've got more than a trifecta.  Kudos to you!

E: Good mission, clear goals/objectives; clear activities. While the components are all there, lacks innovation.

I: Partnerships are clearly crucial to impact, but it's not clear if the schools are defined partnerships so much as an idea or assumption.

M: Reporting to DCA has improved over last 3 years; evaluation methods are fine but not superb; a long history of success and evidence of sustainability.

A: Making some strides, but the facility itself raises concerns

Strong case for economic benefit.

Interesting approach for using "expert" advice.